Tribunal determination involving disputed deferment rate and marriage value calculation on a sub-80-year lease.
View Analysis — coming soonMarket Snapshot
Headline statistics from the analysed tribunal dataset. Figures update as new decisions are added.
Latest Analysed Cases
A rolling view of recently analysed First-tier Tribunal lease extension decisions.
Statutory extension where comparable evidence and relativity assumptions were the central points of dispute.
View Analysis — coming soonShort-lease determination with ground rent capitalisation and modern comparable evidence reviewed in detail.
View Analysis — coming soonAbove-80-year extension with narrow gap between parties' valuations resolved on deferment evidence.
View Analysis — coming soonJust-below-80-year case illustrating how marriage value materially shifts premiums at the threshold.
View Analysis — coming soonOuter London determination where local comparable evidence drove a markedly different outcome from prime central cases.
View Analysis — coming soonPlaceholder cases shown. Real First-tier Tribunal decisions will populate this list as the dataset expands.
Key Trends
Recurring themes observed across recently analysed tribunal outcomes. For deeper analysis on specific patterns, see our research on lease extension cost by years remaining, premiums below 80 years and the London borough analysis. To put your own figure in context, you can benchmark your quote against comparable cases.
- Premiums increasing for shorter leases
Tribunal outcomes consistently show that as the unexpired term reduces, premiums rise non-linearly — with the steepest movement around the 80-year threshold.
- Marriage value disputes
Where leases fall below 80 years, marriage value is a frequent point of contention, with relativity assumptions driving much of the gap between parties.
- Ground rent trends
Tribunals continue to scrutinise ground rent capitalisation, especially where rent review clauses or doubling provisions affect the freeholder's interest.
- Regional differences
Premiums vary significantly between prime central London and outer boroughs, reflecting underlying values and the comparable evidence each tribunal weighs.
- Negotiation themes
Many cases settle close to the midpoint of the parties' valuations — reinforcing the value of benchmarking quotes against comparable tribunal outcomes early.
Notable Decision
Two-bedroom flat, prime central London, 76 years unexpired
Tribunal determined a premium materially below the freeholder's opening position but above the leaseholder's offer, after rejecting both parties' relativity evidence and substituting its own.
Illustrates how tribunals routinely depart from both parties' valuations when comparable evidence is weak — and why a benchmark grounded in actual decisions is more reliable than either side's opening figure.
Opening offers — from freeholders or leaseholders — are rarely a good predictor of tribunal outcomes. Comparable decisions are.
Search & Filter
Filter the tribunal dataset by borough, postcode, lease length, premium range and decision year. Interactive filtering is coming soon.
Compare Your Quote Against Comparable Tribunal Outcomes
Rather than relying on generic estimates, compare your lease extension quote against real tribunal decisions involving similar properties.
Check My QuoteFrequently asked questions
Methodology
Inclusion criteria, exclusions, sample size and calculation methodology vary by analysis. Statistics are based only on cases containing sufficient data for the relevant variables.
Caveats
- Tribunal decisions represent disputed cases rather than the entire market.
- Not all decisions contain every data field.
- Sample sizes vary by analysis.
- Small sample groups should be interpreted cautiously.
Compare Your Quote Against Comparable Tribunal Outcomes
Rather than relying on generic estimates, compare your lease extension quote against real tribunal decisions involving similar properties.
Check My QuoteLeaseIntel provides information and benchmarking based on tribunal decisions. It does not provide legal advice or valuation advice.