Updated as new tribunal decisions are analysed

Latest Lease Extension Tribunal Outcomes

LeaseIntel analyses tribunal decisions to identify valuation trends, premium movements and notable lease extension cases.

Check My Quote

About This Analysis

Dataset
LeaseIntel Tribunal Database
Database Size
6,000+ leasehold tribunal decisions spanning more than 20 years of First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) rulings across England & Wales.
Analysis Sample
Individual analyses use the subset of cases containing the specific data required for that study. Sample sizes therefore vary between analyses depending on data availability and inclusion criteria. For example, a study of lease length and premiums only includes cases where both values are recorded, while a London district analysis draws on a different subset.
Cases Analysed
654 (subset used in this analysis)
Coverage
England & Wales
Period
2005–2025
Source
First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)
Methodology
LeaseIntel extracts, standardises and analyses tribunal decisions to identify lease extension valuation trends and outcomes.
Last Updated
June 2026

Market Snapshot

Headline statistics from the analysed tribunal dataset. Figures update as new decisions are added.

Tribunal cases analysed
Pending
Median premium
Pending
Median lease length
Pending
Average premium as % of property value
Pending
Highest premium
Pending
Lowest premium
Pending

Latest Analysed Cases

A rolling view of recently analysed First-tier Tribunal lease extension decisions.

Pending Westminster · SW1
Lease length
72 yrs
Premium
Pending

Tribunal determination involving disputed deferment rate and marriage value calculation on a sub-80-year lease.

View Analysis — coming soon
Pending Kensington · SW5
Lease length
84 yrs
Premium
Pending

Statutory extension where comparable evidence and relativity assumptions were the central points of dispute.

View Analysis — coming soon
Pending Camden · NW1
Lease length
67 yrs
Premium
Pending

Short-lease determination with ground rent capitalisation and modern comparable evidence reviewed in detail.

View Analysis — coming soon
Pending Hackney · E8
Lease length
91 yrs
Premium
Pending

Above-80-year extension with narrow gap between parties' valuations resolved on deferment evidence.

View Analysis — coming soon
Pending Wandsworth · SW18
Lease length
78 yrs
Premium
Pending

Just-below-80-year case illustrating how marriage value materially shifts premiums at the threshold.

View Analysis — coming soon
Pending Leyton · E10
Lease length
75 yrs
Premium
Pending

Outer London determination where local comparable evidence drove a markedly different outcome from prime central cases.

View Analysis — coming soon

Placeholder cases shown. Real First-tier Tribunal decisions will populate this list as the dataset expands.

Notable Decision

Featured case

Two-bedroom flat, prime central London, 76 years unexpired

Tribunal outcome

Tribunal determined a premium materially below the freeholder's opening position but above the leaseholder's offer, after rejecting both parties' relativity evidence and substituting its own.

Why it matters

Illustrates how tribunals routinely depart from both parties' valuations when comparable evidence is weak — and why a benchmark grounded in actual decisions is more reliable than either side's opening figure.

Key lesson

Opening offers — from freeholders or leaseholders — are rarely a good predictor of tribunal outcomes. Comparable decisions are.

Search & Filter

Filter the tribunal dataset by borough, postcode, lease length, premium range and decision year. Interactive filtering is coming soon.

Search tribunal cases — coming soon
Borough
Coming soon
Postcode
Coming soon
Lease length
Coming soon
Premium range
Coming soon
Decision year
Coming soon

Compare Your Quote Against Comparable Tribunal Outcomes

Rather than relying on generic estimates, compare your lease extension quote against real tribunal decisions involving similar properties.

Check My Quote

Frequently asked questions

Methodology

Inclusion criteria, exclusions, sample size and calculation methodology vary by analysis. Statistics are based only on cases containing sufficient data for the relevant variables.

Caveats

  • Tribunal decisions represent disputed cases rather than the entire market.
  • Not all decisions contain every data field.
  • Sample sizes vary by analysis.
  • Small sample groups should be interpreted cautiously.

Compare Your Quote Against Comparable Tribunal Outcomes

Rather than relying on generic estimates, compare your lease extension quote against real tribunal decisions involving similar properties.

Check My Quote

LeaseIntel provides information and benchmarking based on tribunal decisions. It does not provide legal advice or valuation advice.

Last updated: June 2026