Most leaseholders receive a premium quote from a surveyor or freeholder without knowing whether it is reasonable.
One of the best sources of evidence is previous First-tier Tribunal decisions.
Tribunal decisions provide real-world examples of how lease extension disputes have been resolved and can help identify whether a proposed premium falls within a reasonable range.
LeaseIntel analyses comparable tribunal decisions to help leaseholders benchmark their quote against actual outcomes.
Received a lease extension quote?
Compare it against comparable First-tier Tribunal decisions.
Check My QuoteNot legal or financial advice · Independent benchmarking
What is the First-tier Tribunal?
Why tribunal decisions matter
Published tribunal decisions reveal a great deal about how lease extension premiums are determined in contested cases, including:
- • Premiums awarded for comparable properties.
- • Valuation assumptions accepted or rejected by the panel.
- • Treatment of marriage value where the lease is below 80 years.
- • Relativity disputes between the parties' valuers.
- • Ground rent assumptions and capitalisation rates.
Together, these decisions create a body of evidence that valuers and other professionals often consider when forming a view on a reasonable premium.
What makes a tribunal case comparable?
Not every published decision is relevant to every lease extension. Comparability typically depends on:
- • Remaining lease length — particularly whether the lease is above or below 80 years (see our 80 year lease rule guide).
- • Property value at the valuation date.
- • Ground rent profile, including escalation provisions.
- • Location and local market characteristics.
- • Building characteristics — flat vs house, age, tenure structure.
Matching on these factors is what makes comparable decisions useful evidence rather than anecdote.
Tribunal decisions are more useful than generic calculators
Online calculators have their place. They apply a formula to a small set of inputs and produce an estimate quickly, which can be a helpful starting point.
A tribunal decision is different in nature. It reflects a real dispute, involving a real property, where both sides' valuations were tested by an independent panel. The figure the tribunal arrived at carries the weight of that scrutiny.
Calculators answer "what does the formula produce?" Comparable tribunal decisions answer "what did an independent panel decide was reasonable in a similar case?" — a more directly useful question when assessing a quote.
What tribunal data can reveal
- • Typical premiums by remaining lease length.
- • How marriage value disputes have been resolved.
- • Regional variations in valuation inputs and outcomes.
- • Outcomes of contested valuations where parties disagreed on key inputs.
- • Differences between freeholders' initial offers and the figures tribunals ultimately determined.
How LeaseIntel uses tribunal decisions
LeaseIntel is a benchmarking platform, not a solicitor or valuation service. The product is built around tribunal data:
- • Thousands of First-tier Tribunal decisions analysed and structured.
- • Comparable case matching on unexpired term, property value, ground rent and geography.
- • Benchmarking that places a quoted premium against the distribution of comparable outcomes.
- • Independent information — LeaseIntel does not act for freeholders or leaseholders and earns no commission on any extension.
Don't negotiate blind.
See how comparable tribunal cases were resolved before accepting a premium.
Get LeaseIntel ReportNot legal or financial advice · Independent benchmarking
Frequently asked questions
Benchmark your quote against tribunal decisions
Tribunal decisions are the most direct evidence of what independent panels have considered reasonable in comparable cases. LeaseIntel matches your quote against them.
Is My Lease Extension Quote Too High?Independent · Not a valuation or legal advice · Tribunal outcomes, not formula estimates