Proprietary Tribunal Analysis

The Most Expensive Lease Extension Tribunal Decisions

The LeaseIntel dataset of 2,349 First-tier Tribunal decisions includes premiums ranging from £14 to over £10 million. The largest cases share a common profile: prime central London addresses, very short unexpired terms, and exceptional property values.

Benchmark My Quote Against Tribunal Cases

About This Analysis

Dataset
LeaseIntel Tribunal Database
Database Size
6,000+ leasehold tribunal decisions spanning more than 20 years of First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) rulings across England & Wales.
Analysis Sample
Individual analyses use the subset of cases containing the specific data required for that study. Sample sizes therefore vary between analyses depending on data availability and inclusion criteria. For example, a study of lease length and premiums only includes cases where both values are recorded, while a London district analysis draws on a different subset.
Cases Analysed
1,009 (subset used in this analysis)
Coverage
England & Wales
Period
2005–2025
Source
First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)
Methodology
LeaseIntel extracts, standardises and analyses tribunal decisions to identify lease extension valuation trends and outcomes.
Last Updated
June 2026
Largest tribunal-determined premium
£10,204,082
Grosvenor Square, London W1K
Number of decisions above £1 million
12
From 1,009 decisions with determined premiums
Median premium across all decisions
£20,715
Very large awards are statistical outliers

The ten largest tribunal-determined premiums

The ten largest premiums in the LeaseIntel dataset share a clear profile. All are located in prime central London — addresses in Grosvenor Square, Kensington, Belgravia, Cadogan Square and Knightsbridge. Most involve very short unexpired terms of under 25 years combined with property values in the millions. At this intersection of extreme scarcity (very little lease remaining) and extreme value, the premium calculation produces figures that bear little resemblance to a typical lease extension.

Premium determinedYears remainingAddressRegion
£10,204,082N/AFlat 7, 49 Grosvenor Square, W1KLondon
£2,931,0898.17 yrsFlat 4, Kensington Court Gardens, W8London
£2,575,000N/AFlat D, 14–15 Egerton Gardens, SW3London
£2,202,00721.0 yrsFlat 1, 3 Upper Belgrave Street, SW1London
£1,495,20038.12 yrsFlats 1 and A, 76–78 Sloane Street, SW1London
£1,337,43015.06 yrsFlat 1, 14 Cadogan Square, SW1XLondon
£1,313,68612.13 yrsFlat 6, 93 Eaton Place, SW1XLondon
£1,203,87012.98 yrsFlat 4, 91 Cadogan Gardens, SW3London
£1,203,000N/AFlat 5, 53 Ennismore Gardens, SW7London
£1,090,9279.66 yrsFlat 6, Connaught Court, W2London
Source: LeaseIntel Tribunal Database
Sample: 1,009
Period: 2005–2025

What drives extreme premiums

Three factors combine to produce the largest premiums in the dataset. First, very short unexpired terms — most of the top ten cases involve fewer than 25 years remaining. At this stage, the marriage value component (the increase in property value that results from the extension) represents a very large absolute sum. Second, exceptionally high freehold values in prime central London, where comparable properties sell for millions. Third, in some cases, ground rents that are themselves substantial, adding to the deferment value component.

These cases are genuinely exceptional. The top ten account for a combined premium of approximately £24.6 million, but they represent fewer than 1% of the 1,009 decisions with determined premiums. The median premium across all decisions is £20,715 — less than 0.2% of the largest case.

Are these cases relevant to a typical leaseholder?

In most respects, no. The properties in the top ten list are among the most valuable residential addresses in the United Kingdom. The leaseholders involved faced costs that are simply not representative of the typical lease extension experience.

What these cases do illustrate — clearly and starkly — is the consequence of allowing a lease on a high-value property to fall to a very short term. The premium on a central London flat worth £3 million with 8 years remaining is of a different magnitude than the same flat with 85 years remaining. The exponential relationship between diminishing lease length and increasing premium applies at all price levels; these cases simply show it at its most extreme.

Received a lease extension quote?

Compare it against comparable First-tier Tribunal decisions.

Check My Quote

Frequently asked questions

Methodology

LeaseIntel analyses published First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decisions on lease extension premiums. Each decision is parsed into a structured record covering unexpired term at the valuation date, property value, ground rent profile, deferment and capitalisation rates, marriage value treatment and the final premium determined.

  • Analyses only include decisions containing the specific lease-term and valuation data required for that study.
  • Cases are grouped by unexpired term at the valuation date (not the date of the decision).
  • Sample sizes vary between analyses because not every decision records every variable.
  • Small sample groups are flagged with a confidence indicator and interpreted cautiously.
  • Where decisions span multiple flats or hearings, each lease is treated as a separate observation.

Caveats

  • Tribunal decisions represent disputed cases rather than the entire market.
  • Not all decisions contain every data field.
  • Sample sizes vary by analysis.
  • Small sample groups should be interpreted cautiously.

Benchmark your quote

These figures represent the extreme end of the LeaseIntel dataset. The vast majority of lease extension premiums are far lower. Your own premium depends on your property's value, your specific lease length and the valuation evidence available. LeaseIntel compares your circumstances with similar tribunal decisions to provide a personalised benchmark.

Is My Lease Extension Quote Too High?

Independent · Not a valuation or legal advice · Tribunal outcomes, not formula estimates